On magazines without editorial direction

Submitted by gwolf on Wed, 05/16/2007 - 19:45.
Scott complains on how Linux Format #93's articles comparing Ubuntu and other distributions often contradict each other, and blames it on the lack of any editorial direction or basic research.
I... Have to confirm this. But anyway, I can stand a bit on the different writers' side - Each article is written by a different person and, although the magazine must try to be coherent (of course, within certain limits - if the magazine suggests editor's picks in one article, they should not bash them to death in the next one).
I write the Linux column in the Spanish edition of PC Magazine. No, it's by far not a technical column, nor anything far like it. The magazine is end-user oriented, and clearly sponsorship-driven - In fact, my column was not part of the magazine for quite some time, as they gear it towards end-users, and sponsors (I cannot venture which sponsors, but your imagination will probably go to the same company as mine) do not like what I write about. All in all, I get the general topics which each month's edition will cover, and I just have to write an article about one of them. Of course, I don't know most of the other writers. There is no interaction at all.
And I guess that Linux Format is a typical magazine - If they run like PC Magazine, they just won't have the time to put all the articles together checking for inconsistencies. I think it is enough of a task to chase the contributors month after month (BTW, I'm a week late already :-/ But I cannot finish just today, as there's too much work to do, and I spend my time blogging... Hmh, time to finish this post, as coitus interruptus as it may seem).
( categories: )

Re: On magazines without editorial direction

Submitted by garaged (not verified) on Thu, 05/17/2007 - 13:51.
I think the problem is money, you need to invest a lot of time to check thoroughly thru any article, to be able to do this you need someone really good in the field, and that person wont be cheap :) The best you can do is try to write the best, and maybe ask someone to review before is published :), that's what everybody does ins't it :)

Re: Re: On magazines without editorial direction

Submitted by Gunnar (not verified) on Thu, 05/17/2007 - 15:03.
And even there - Different people have different opinions, and they might all be valid. Scott complains about a magazine saying in different pages that Ubuntu is uber-kewl and mega-shitty. Yes, different people's experiences will get you different results.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <br> <b> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <tt> <pre> <strike>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can enable syntax highlighting of source code with the following tags: <code>, <blockcode>. Beside the tag style "<foo>" it is also possible to use "[foo]".

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
   ___    _   ___   ____   __   __ __   __
  ( _ )  | | |_ _| / ___|  \ \ / / \ \ / /
  / _ \  | |  | |  \___ \   \ V /   \ V / 
 | (_) | | |  | |   ___) |   | |     | |  
  \___/  |_| |___| |____/    |_|     |_|
Enter the code depicted in ASCII art style.